As with all bad endings, the problem really lies at the beginning, and at the beginning of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, neither Huck nor Twain takes Jim’s desire for freedom at all seriously, that is, they do not accord it the respect that a man’s passion deserves. The sign of this is that not only do the two never cross the Mississippi to Illinois, a free state, but the Jackson’s Island scenes show that such a crossing, even in secret, is both possible and routine, and even though it would present legal difficulties for an escaped slave , these would certainly pose no more hardship than locating the mouth of the Ohio and then finding passage up it. It is true that there could have been slave catchers in pursuit (though the novel ostensibly take place in the 1840’s and the Fugitive Slave Act was not passed until 1850), but Twain’s moral failure, once Huck and Jim link up, is never even to account for their choice to go down the river rather than across it. What this reveals is that for all his lip service to real attachment between white boy and black man, Twain really saw Jim as no more than Huck’s sidekick, homoerotic or otherwise. All the claims that are routinely made for the book’s humanitarian power are, in the end, simply absurd. Jim is never autonomous, never has a vote, always find his purposed subordinate to Huck’s and , like every good sidekick, he never minds. He grows every more passive and also more affectionate as Huck and the Duke and the Dauphin and Tom (and Twain) make ever more use of him for their own purposes. But this use they make of him is not supplementary; it is integral to Twain’s whole conception of the novel. Twain thinks that Huck’s affection is good enough reward for Jim.
3. After viewing the 60 Minutes piece,the teacher letter from English Journal, and reading one of these editorial articles from NYT , where do you fall in the debate about the novel? Be sure to draw from these sources in your response.
Finish by November 28, 2012- in your Critical Reading Journal Notebook
For Class participation during break- From New York Times-
Read a review from music, film, food, video games, etc. Find a zinger and share it with me in the form below. Does it have snark, sharp diction, humor, or complex syntax? Send it along...here.
Here are some of my favorite reviewers of film:
A.O. Scott Manohla Dargis
Roger Ebert- Suntimes AV Club
Tribune Critics are pay-walled- meh but you can access them through Proquest- ha HA!
from a review by Manohla Dargis-The Man With the Iron Fists
This is a movie as drenched in genre love as it is in the arterial spray from its hordes of sliced and diced characters.from A.O Scott's review of Lincoln-
The smaller, plainer America of the mid-19th century is evoked by the brownish chiaroscuro of Janusz Kaminski’s cinematography, by the mud, brick and wood of Rick Carter’s production design and by enough important facial hair to make the young beard farmers of 21st-century Brooklyn weep tears of envy.